A new report by the Washington Coastal Resilience Project team, entitled Projected Sea Level Rise for Washington State – A 2018 Assessment, provides new projections for more than 150 different sites along the Washington coastline, from all marine shorelines in Washington state.
The report incorporates the unique geology-driven land motion, with uplift at Neah Bay and sinking in Seattle. And it provides the latest, probabilistic estimates to let planners weigh the risks of different scenarios.
The new report is part of the Washington Coastal Resilience Project, a three-year effort funded in 2016 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Regional Coastal Resilience Grants Program. The larger project includes collaborations with partners at Island County, which covers Whidbey Island and Camano Island, and the City of Tacoma to incorporate climate change in coastal plans as a pilot.
The report provides probabilistic estimates for 171 coastal sites each decade from now until 2150. The analysis follows two previous assessments of sea-level rise in the state: the 2012 national report for sea-level rise in Washington, Oregon and California, and a 2008 report led by the UW Climate Impacts Group. In addition to updating the science, the new report offers more detail on what to expect at specific locations.
The study follows a 2015 UW report on how climate change will affect Puget Sound. This new study provides much greater detail about sea-level rise, both in Puget Sound and along the coast. “Previous assessments were zoomed out, and were not fine-scale enough to capture the variations in land movement along the coastlines,” said second author Harriet Morgan, a research consultant with the UW Climate Impacts Group. “Neah Bay is rising, and south Puget Sound is sinking. That up and down movement has a pretty big influence on how far the ocean will be able to travel inland.”
“There are two factors that determine what steps a community might take to adapt, and both really need to be decided at the local level. First, what is the context — is it a hospital or other piece of critical infrastructure, or is it a park? That’s your risk tolerance. And second, what is your value judgment of the amount of risk that’s acceptable?” said third author Guillaume Mauger, a research scientist at the Climate Impacts Group.
The study was funded by the NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management and NOAA’s Climate Impacts Research Consortium, with additional support from project partners: the Washington Department of Ecology, Washington Sea Grant, UW Climate Impacts Group, the City of Tacoma, Island County, King County, NOAA Office of Coastal Management, The Nature Conservancy, Padilla Bay National Estuary Research Reserve, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, University of Oregon, University of Washington Climate Impacts Group , University of Washington Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Western Washington University. The UW College of the Environment provided design support for this report.
